The Structural Finding
Between 1905 and 1917 Mondrian's compositions undergo a measurable structural shift that precedes the famous grid. The clearest signal is centroid consolidation: early works are laterally scattered: 38% lean left, 34% center, 28% right. By 1910–1913, 57% of paintings are center-balanced. Mean horizontal displacement drops by 44%. The compositions become gravitationally neutral before any visual grammar of De Stijl is in place.
A second signal follows in 1913–1914: peripheral pull (xp) collapses from ~0.18 to 0.07. Structural mass migrates away from frame edges. This is the Cubist synthesis moment; cohesion (μ) peaks in 1914 at mean 0.49, with four paintings above 0.55. The composition contracts inward and unifies.
Then 1917 reverses. The Plus and Minus works (all-over compositions with no single dominant region) score lower cohesion (mean μ 0.18) than the early landscapes. Peripheral pull rises again (xp ~0.20). The kernel reads structural fragmentation in exactly the works that feel most abstract. The grid itself falls outside this dataset; what is visible here is the structural preparation and the scatter that preceded it.
Centroid neutrality arrives before the grid. Fragmentation follows the Cubist peak. The grid is the resolution of a structural arc, not its beginning.